← News

neetbros.comSociety

We already trust kids and seniors with a floor

Whenever basic income comes up, someone says it would never work because people would just stop trying. What gets skipped is that we already do it. Not for everyone, but for two big groups. Kids get a monthly cheque through their parents. Seniors get a monthly cheque for the rest of their lives. Nobody asks a six year old or an eighty year old to show a job search log. The only people we treat as suspects are the ones in the middle, and I think that tells you more about our story of work than about what actually helps people.

SocietyUBIChild benefitPensionsBasic incomeWelfareLess workNEET
Cream diagram showing a support floor for childhood and old age but a means tested gap for working age adults, with the neetbros logo
We already trust kids and seniors with a floor

The floor at the start

In Canada the child benefit arrives every month. It is tax free, it gets smaller as family income rises, and the poorest families get the most. Parents do not have to prove they spent it on the right things. They just get it, and they get to decide.

Lots of other countries do something similar. The details change, but the idea is the same. A child should not go without food or a coat because of what their parents earn this year.

When these programs get bigger, child poverty tends to drop, and it tends to drop fast. That is not because kids got better at budgeting. It is because money is the thing poor families are short of, and giving them money fixes that part directly.

The floor at the end

At the other end of life it is the same story. Public pensions, plus top ups for seniors with little income, mean most older people have a monthly amount they can count on whether or not they ever had a good job.

Before those programs, being old was one of the most reliable ways to be poor. After them, senior poverty fell a long way in a lot of countries. We did that on purpose, and almost nobody wants to undo it.

We do not call that welfare dependency. We call it dignity in old age. Nobody says grandma should be out stocking shelves to prove she is not lazy.

A switch flipped on and off

The clearest test I know of happened in the United States in 2021. For about half a year, families got a bigger child tax credit paid monthly, with no work requirement for the poorest families.

Child poverty fell to the lowest level on record. Then Congress let it expire, and the next year child poverty jumped back up, more than doubling by the government's own measure.

Same kids, same parents, same economy. The only thing that changed was whether the floor was there. When people say a cash floor does nothing, this is the part they leave out.

The middle is where the suspicion lives

Turn eighteen, or finish school, and the rules flip. Now support is something you apply for. You fill out forms, you report every bit of income, you show you are looking for work, and you wait. If you slip up, it gets cut.

The money is often smaller and the strings are much longer. And the whole process is built around a fear that someone, somewhere, might get help they did not earn.

But the kid and the senior did not earn their floor either. We decided they deserved it because they were people. Somewhere between childhood and retirement we decided that stops being enough.

Why we treat adults differently

The usual answer is that working age adults could be working. But could is doing a lot of work in that sentence. There are not enough good jobs for everyone, a lot of jobs do not pay enough to live on, and a lot of people are caring for someone, sick, burned out, or stuck where there is nothing nearby.

I think the real reason is older. A floor for adults feels like it breaks the deal where you trade your time for the right to exist. Kids have not entered the deal yet, and seniors are seen as having paid in. Everyone else has to keep paying.

That deal made more sense when a single job could support a family and most of the work was physical work that needed doing. We are richer and more automated than ever, and the deal has not been updated.

Basic income is just closing the gap

Seen this way, a basic income, or neetbux, is not some wild new idea. It is taking two programs we already like and filling in the stretch between them.

You would still be able to work, earn more, and build a life. You just would not have to prove you deserve to eat first. That is what we already promise the very young and the very old, and the sky has not fallen.

If you are a NEET in the middle stretch right now, you are not a special case of failure. You are in the one part of life where we stopped trusting people. Small help in the meantime counts too, and the AI you already pay for can claim paid micro-tasks for sats on neetbros.

Retirement is UBI you have to wait for is about the pension side of this idea. A small town already tried this is about the Mincome pilot in Dauphin, Manitoba. Help shouldn't feel like a trial is about how support is handed out to adults. The welfare cliff punishes anyone who tries is about what happens when you earn a little. Bootstraps were always a joke is about why nobody rises without a floor.